Healthcare services

Explore how healthcare services are used, how disease burden and health vary, and what research and statistics tell us. Figures come from different sources and must be interpreted according to what they actually measure.

Healthcare use

How many people use GPs, out-of-hours emergency care and specialist healthcare? The charts distinguish consultations, patients and percentages.

Back to the topic overview

Statistics Norway · Out-of-hours emergency care · Women

How many women had no, one or several out-of-hours emergency consultations?

Here you can see the proportion of women who had no, exactly one or at least two out-of-hours emergency consultations in each year. The figures are percentages of women of all ages, not counts of consultations.

How to read the chart

Each horizontal bar represents 100 women. Dark blue shows how many had no consultations, medium blue those who had one, and light blue the remainder with two or more. The parts add up to 100%.

Show exact annual figures in a table

On mobile, swipe the table horizontally to see all columns.

YearProportion of people with 0 out-of-hours emergency consultations (percent)Proportion of people with 1 out-of-hours emergency consultation (percent)Two or more (calculated)
202083.212.44.4
202183.112.54.4
20228312.54.5
202383.312.44.3
202483.212.44.4
202583.612.24.2

Explore out-of-hours care by age

Choose an age group to compare percentages across years. Only the available figures from the restricted Statistics Norway extract are shown here.

No consultationsExactly oneTwo or more (calculated)

Each bar represents 100 women in the selected age group. The parts show the proportion with no, one and at least two consultations during the year.

2020None: 76.9 % · One: 16.6 % · Two+: 6.5 %
2021None: 72.1 % · One: 18.6 % · Two+: 9.3 %
2022None: 70.6 % · One: 19.7 % · Two+: 9.7 %
2023None: 72.4 % · One: 18.9 % · Two+: 8.7 %
2024None: 72.7 % · One: 18.8 % · Two+: 8.5 %
2025None: 73.6 % · One: 18.2 % · Two+: 8.2 %

The proportion with two or more consultations is calculated as the remainder up to 100%. This assumes that the measures cover the same population and do not overlap. Small differences may result from rounding.

YearProportion of people with 0 out-of-hours emergency consultations (percent)Proportion of people with 1 out-of-hours emergency consultation (percent)
202076.916.6
202172.118.6
202270.619.7
202372.418.9
202472.718.8
202573.618.2

Compare age groups

Select year and measure to compare the recorded percentages across age groups.

0-5 år73.6 %
6-15 år86.1 %
16-19 år80.3 %
20-29 år81 %
30-49 år85.3 %
50-66 år86.6 %
67-79 år84.1 %
80-89 år77.5 %
90 år eller eldre75.9 %

All bars use the same scale from 0 to 100%. Different age groups have different population sizes. Differences in proportions alone do not establish differences in health needs or quality of care.

Download figures (CSV)

The file contains all selected age groups, years and both measures, with Statistics Norway as the original source and Tidlignok / Womanhood Initiative as the presenter. Missing values remain blank.

The first view shows percentages for one selected age group of women. Age groups remain as defined by Statistics Norway. The percentages describe recorded use of out-of-hours emergency care, not healthcare needs or treatment quality.

What do the figures mean?

The figures show how many out of 100 women had zero, one or at least two registered out-of-hours emergency consultations during a year. The 'two or more' category is calculated from the two published percentages and must not be interpreted as a count of consultations. The figures do not explain reasons for using out-of-hours care or the need for healthcare.

About the data
Age
All ages
Sex
Women
Statistical variable
Proportion of people with 0 out-of-hours emergency consultations (percent), Proportion of people with 1 out-of-hours emergency consultation (percent)
Year
2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025

Source: Statistics Norway, table 10310. The table shows a specific extract from Statistics Norway. Newer figures may be available in its statistical database.

Statistics Norway · Healthcare

Patients, GPs and out-of-hours emergency care

Here you can see how many people use different healthcare services and how that use has changed. We distinguish between patient counts, consultations per person and percentages because they describe different aspects of healthcare.

GP consultations among women and men

Average number of consultations per person per year, 2012–2025. In 2025, women had an average of 3.6 consultations, while men had 2.4.

WomenMen
0123420122014201620182020202220242025

The vertical axis starts at zero. These are consultations per person, not the total number of consultations or the proportion who visited a GP.

Show all annual values
YearWomenMen
20123.12.2
20133.02.2
20143.12.2
20153.12.2
20163.12.2
20173.12.2
20183.12.2
20193.22.2
20203.42.3
20213.62.4
20223.62.4
20233.62.4
20243.62.4
20253.62.4

Source: Statistics Norway, General practitioner services, Figure 6: GP consultations by sex, 2012–2025. Published in 2026. The differences show recorded use of services, not necessarily differences in treatment needs or access.

Out-of-hours emergency care use by sex

Proportion of people who had at least one out-of-hours emergency consultation during the year. We compare 2019 and 2025, not a continuous annual series.

2019

Women18 %
Men16 %

2025

Women16 %
Men15 %

Both bar charts use an axis from 0 to 100 percent. The percentage refers to people, not the proportion of all consultations.

Show annual values in a table
YearWomenMen
201918 %16 %
202516 %15 %

Sources: Statistics Norway, GP services (2025 figures) and Statistics Norway, corresponding table for 2019. Source table 10310. The changes show recorded contacts with out-of-hours emergency services, not direct changes in disease prevalence or accessibility.

Patients in specialist healthcare

Number of people receiving treatment in Norway in 2024 and 2025, broken down by sex. These are not counts of consultations or rates per inhabitant. Service areas have separate scales and must not be added together: the same person may have received treatment in both.

Somatic specialist healthcare

2024

Women1,450,461
Men1,206,396

2025

Women1,484,946
Men1,231,272

Scale: 0–1,600,000 patients.

Adult mental healthcare

2024

Women123,627
Men77,913

2025

Women122,457
Men76,704

Scale: 0–160,000 patients.

Show exact annual values
YearSomatic care, womenSomatic care, menMental healthcare, womenMental healthcare, men
20241,450,4611,206,396123,62777,913
20251,484,9461,231,272122,45776,704
Expand to 2015–2025 and compare age groups

Statistics Norway's source tables have annual figures from 2015 to 2025. The charts above show key figures for 2024–2025. The detailed annual series can be explored by sex and age further down the page when the local Statistics Norway files are available. We do not interpolate figures.

For adult mental healthcare (table 14820), the age groups are 18–29, 30–49, 50–66 and 67 years or older. Somatic care (table 14824) must be checked using its own age categories. In later comparisons, we must distinguish patient counts from patients per inhabitant and consider changes in the registration of national identity numbers.

Source: SSB, Patients in specialist healthcare, Table 1, updated 22 June 2026 (StatBank tables 14820 and 14824). The figures cover somatic care and adult mental healthcare, not child and adolescent mental healthcare or interdisciplinary specialist substance-use treatment. Only people with a valid national identity or D-number are included. The scope may be affected by recording practices. The counts do not measure treatment needs or waiting times.

How were patients treated?

Statistics Norway distinguishes between outpatients and inpatients. The groups overlap: one person may be included in several treatment categories. The figures are not counts of treatments.

Outpatients, somatic care

2024

Women1,386,297
Men1,143,963

2025

Women1,422,735
Men1,170,033

Inpatients, somatic care

2024

Women316,626
Men259,338

2025

Women319,836
Men260,880

Inpatients, adult mental healthcare

2024

Women13,680
Men13,227

2025

Women13,527
Men12,849

Bars start at zero and are scaled separately for each treatment category, so magnitudes cannot be compared visually across panels.

Show exact figures in a table
Type of treatmentYearWomenMen
Outpatients, somatic care20241,386,2971,143,963
Outpatients, somatic care20251,422,7351,170,033
Inpatients, somatic care2024316,626259,338
Inpatients, somatic care2025319,836260,880
Inpatients, adult mental healthcare202413,68013,227
Inpatients, adult mental healthcare202513,52712,849

Source: SSB, Patients in specialist healthcare, tabell 1, oppdatert 22. juni 2026. Annual series by sex and age are available in the explorer below when the Statistics Norway files are accessible.

Explore patients by year, sex and age

Adult mental healthcare

Official Statistics Norway figures for patient counts, not consultations or patients per inhabitant. Select sex and age group to follow trends within the same category. Different age groups cannot be compared directly without accounting for population size.

Show all annual figures
YearPatients
2015111,561
2016114,861
2017115,341
2018115,611
2019116,763
2020117,747
2021123,891
2022127,551
2023127,476
2024123,630
2025122,457

Source: Statistics Norway table 14820. Annual figures are displayed only when a local extract is available. Comparing patient counts is not the same as comparing population-adjusted rates.

About Statistics Norway tables and data

The figures include different kinds of contact with healthcare. Numbers of people, numbers of consultations and population percentages are different measures. The charts therefore show what was measured, the reference period and the groups included.

SSB · tabell 14820

Patients in specialist healthcare

The table can be broken down by sex. Individual charts specify the population used.

Show breakdowns and limitations
Region
Whole country
Sex
Women
Age
Total
Providers within specialist healthcare
Total
Statistical variable
Patients, Inpatients
Year
2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025

SSB · tabell 14824

Patient statistics in specialist healthcare

The table can be broken down by sex. Individual charts specify the population used.

Show breakdowns and limitations
Region
Whole country
Sex
Women
Age
All ages
Providers within specialist healthcare
Total
Diagnosis
Total
Statistical variable
Patients, Outpatients
Year
2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025

SSB · tabell 09535

GP consultations

The table can be broken down by sex. Individual charts specify the population used.

Show breakdowns and limitations
Region
Whole country
Age
All ages
Sex
Women
Statistical variable
Proportion of people with 0 GP consultations (percent), Proportion of people with 1–2 GP consultations (percent)
Year
2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025

SSB · tabell 10310

Out-of-hours emergency consultations

The table can be broken down by sex. Individual charts specify the population used.

Show breakdowns and limitations
Age
All ages
Sex
Women
Statistical variable
Proportion of people with 0 out-of-hours emergency consultations (percent), Proportion of people with 1 out-of-hours emergency consultation (percent)
Year
2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025

When comparing figures over time, groups, recording practices and units of measurement must be consistent. Changes in patient counts may also reflect population size and who seeks healthcare.

Statistics Norway · Table 10310 · 2025

Out-of-hours emergency consultations per person by sex and age

This shows the average number of out-of-hours emergency consultations per person in 2025 within each age group. This is a different measure from the proportion who had at least one out-of-hours emergency consultation, which is already shown further up the page.

Women/girlsMen/boys

0–5 years

Women: 0.40
Men: 0.47

6–15 years

Women: 0.18
Men: 0.19

16–19 years

Women: 0.31
Men: 0.21

20–29 years

Women: 0.30
Men: 0.21

30–49 years

Women: 0.21
Men: 0.17

50–66 years

Women: 0.18
Men: 0.17

67–79 years

Women: 0.23
Men: 0.22

80–89 years

Women: 0.34
Men: 0.35

90 years og eldre

Women: 0.37
Men: 0.47

Common scale: 0–0.50 consultations per person. Age groups follow Statistics Norway's classification.

Show exact Statistics Norway figures in a table
Average out-of-hours emergency consultations per person, 2025
AgeWomenMen
0–5 years0.400.47
6–15 years0.180.19
16–19 years0.310.21
20–29 years0.300.21
30–49 years0.210.17
50–66 years0.180.17
67–79 years0.230.22
80–89 years0.340.35
90 years og eldre0.370.47

These figures are average out-of-hours emergency consultations per person within each age and sex group, not the proportion who visited out-of-hours care. Age groups follow Statistics Norway's own definitions and cannot be added together. Figures have two decimal places as published by Statistics Norway. Differences in use alone do not indicate differences in treatment needs or access.

Open Statistics Norway's original table 10310

Original source: Statistics Norway, table 10310, updated 28 May 2026. Presented by Tidlignok, Womanhood Initiative. Checked on 4 November 2026.

Waiting times and treatment

See how long patients wait and how activity measures change. Some figures cover all patients and cannot be used to describe women separately.

Back to the topic overview

FHI · Norwegian Patient Registry

Waiting times and patients, 2023–2025

Waiting time is the average number of days before healthcare begins. The figures cover all patients, regardless of sex, and do not show waiting times separately for girls or women. Nor do they describe how long each individual patient waits.

Somatic care

2023
75 days
2024
77 days
2025
68 days

Shared scale: 0–90 days.

Adult mental healthcare

2023
54 days
2024
55 days
2025
46 days

Shared scale: 0–90 days.

Child and adolescent mental healthcare

2023
55 days
2024
52 days
2025
41 days

Shared scale: 0–90 days.

Interdisciplinary specialist substance-use treatment

2023
33 days
2024
30 days
2025
26 days

Shared scale: 0–90 days.

See waiting times and patient counts in a table
Service areaYearWaiting time in daysPatients
Somatic care2023752,659,384
Somatic care2024772,688,657
Somatic care2025682,739,878
Adult mental healthcare202354211,540
Adult mental healthcare202455205,196
Adult mental healthcare202546202,444
Child and adolescent mental healthcare20235571,460
Child and adolescent mental healthcare20245272,317
Child and adolescent mental healthcare20254175,027
Interdisciplinary specialist substance-use treatment20233334,360
Interdisciplinary specialist substance-use treatment20243033,982
Interdisciplinary specialist substance-use treatment20252633,313

A person may receive healthcare in several service areas and therefore be included in multiple patient counts. The sum across service areas is consequently not a count of unique patients across all specialist healthcare. Waiting time is a different measure from the number of patients.

Sources: FHI, annual statistics 2023–2024 og FHI, annual statistics 2024–2025, published 17 March 2026.

FHI · Norwegian Patient Registry · 2026

More recent waiting times and activity

This compares corresponding periods in 2025 and 2026, not annual figures. Patient counts cover January–August. Waiting times cover the second four-month period (May–August). Patient counts and average waiting times therefore refer to different measurement periods.

Somatic care

Average waiting time, second four-month period

2025
63 days
2026
63 days

Scale: 0–70 days.

Patients January–August

2025
2,262,292
2026
2,246,285

Patient counts have their own scale within each service area.

Adult mental healthcare

Average waiting time, second four-month period

2025
43 days
2026
43 days

Scale: 0–70 days.

Patients January–August

2025
169,107
2026
166,874

Patient counts have their own scale within each service area.

Child and adolescent mental healthcare

Average waiting time, second four-month period

2025
41 days
2026
42 days

Scale: 0–70 days.

Patients January–August

2025
63,791
2026
64,594

Patient counts have their own scale within each service area.

Interdisciplinary specialist substance-use treatment

Average waiting time, second four-month period

2025
26 days
2026
26 days

Scale: 0–70 days.

Patients January–August

2025
28,478
2026
29,172

Patient counts have their own scale within each service area.

View patient counts and waiting times
Service areaPatients Jan–Aug 2025Patients Jan–Aug 2026Waiting time, second four-month period 2025Waiting time, second four-month period 2026
Somatic care2,262,2922,246,28563 days63 days
Adult mental healthcare169,107166,87443 days43 days
Child and adolescent mental healthcare63,79164,59441 days42 days
Interdisciplinary specialist substance-use treatment28,47829,17226 days26 days

Activity figures are preliminary, while waiting-list figures are final for the stated periods. The same patient may be included in several service areas. Source: FHI, waiting times and activity at the end of August 2026.

Screening and prevention

Participation in screening and vaccination reflects uptake of preventive services, not on its own how many people are ill.

Back to the topic overview

FHI · Prevention

Screening and HPV vaccination

In 2025, 72.7 percent of women aged 25–69 participated in the Norwegian Cervical Screening Programme within the recommended screening interval. A total of 353,435 cervical samples were registered, including samples taken because of symptoms and follow-up samples, and 259 new cases of cervical cancer were recorded. The sample count is not the number of participants.

72.7%

Participation within recommended interval

353,435

Cervical samples in 2025

259

New cases of cervical cancer in 2025

According to the 2025 annual report, women aged 25–33 had the lowest participation in the Norwegian Cervical Screening Programme, and the decline among the youngest participants continued. The programme's target is at least 80 percent participation. We do not display percentages by age or county until the specific figures have been retrieved and verified. Sample counts and participation percentages have different denominators.

FHI also reports that completed HPV vaccination among 16-year-old girls rose from 67 percent in 2013 to 93 percent in 2024. Among 16-year-old boys, coverage was 90 percent in 2024. These figures measure vaccination, not HPV prevalence.

Mammography figures are shown in the next section. The programmes cover different age groups and use different measures of participation.

FHI · Norwegian Cervical Screening Programme · annual report 2025

Cervical samples by age

What proportion of women in each age group had at least one registered cervical sample during the five-year period 2021–2025? We show the age groups covered by the Norwegian Cervical Screening Programme, ages 25–69.

25–29 years67.6 %
30–34 years78.8 %
35–39 years83.7 %
40–44 years80.2 %
45–49 years77.3 %
50–54 years76.6 %
55–59 years76.7 %
60–64 years73.9 %
65–69 years69.7 %

Common scale: 0–100 percent. The bars show the proportion of women in each age group over five years, not the proportion tested in 2025 alone.

See exact annual-report figures in a table
Coverage during 2021–2025
AgeProportion
25–29 years67.6 %
30–34 years78.8 %
35–39 years83.7 %
40–44 years80.2 %
45–49 years77.3 %
50–54 years76.6 %
55–59 years76.7 %
60–64 years73.9 %
65–69 years69.7 %

Important: This is five-year coverage for different age groups, not FHI's 'participation within the recommended screening interval' indicator of 72.7 percent. Nor should the figures be interpreted as meaning a screening sample was always required throughout the five-year period. The screening method and recommended intervals have changed.

Source: FHI, Norwegian Cervical Screening Programme annual report 2025, Table 3.4. The report describes changes in HPV screening and coverage calculations. Original figures checked on 3 November 2026.

Open the original FHI report and Table 3.4

FHI · BreastScreen Norway

Attendance at mammography screening

In 2025, approximately 332,300 women were invited. Of those invited, 78.8 percent attended. The programme invites women aged 50–69. This is the proportion of invited women who attended, not the proportion of all women in Norway.

Trends in attendance

202376.7 %
202476.9 %
202578.8 %

Shared bar scale: 0–100 percent.

Show exact annual values in a table
YearProportion of invitees who attended
202376.7 %
202476.9 %
202578.8 %

Examples of geographic variation in 2025

Oslo

72.8 %

Nordland

82.5 %

Agder

80.6 %

Three selected breast centre areas, not a complete ranking. The areas are defined by BreastScreen Norway.

Source: FHI, key figures for BreastScreen Norway

Health and disease burden

Women and men may have different lifespans and disease burdens. Life expectancy, healthy life years and years lived with disability are distinct measures.

Back to the topic overview

Statistics Norway · Eurostat/Bufdir · Norway

Women live longer, but have fewer healthy life years

Life expectancy indicates how long newborns could expect to live if mortality remained at the level observed in the reference year. Healthy life years is a different measure: the number of years a person can expect to live without activity limitations due to health problems.

Life expectancy · 2025

Women: 84.85 years

Men: 81.61 years

Women had life expectancy 3.24 years higher than men.

Expected healthy life years · 2024

Women: 62.3 years

Men: 67.0 years

Men had 4.7 more expected years without activity limitations. The source uses a different definition and reference year from the life expectancy figure.

How has life expectancy changed?

Statistics Norway, 2015–2025. The bars start at zero and show life expectancy at birth in each calendar year.

2015
Women
84.15
Men
80.36
2016
Women
84.17
Men
80.61
2017
Women
84.28
Men
80.91
2018
Women
84.49
Men
81.00
2019
Women
84.68
Men
81.19
2020
Women
84.89
Men
81.48
2021
Women
84.73
Men
81.59
2022
Women
84.35
Men
80.92
2023
Women
84.63
Men
81.39
2024
Women
84.80
Men
81.59
2025
Women
84.85
Men
81.61

Healthy life expectancy (HALE) · 2023

Global Burden of Disease estimated healthy life expectancy at 70.8 years for women and 70.3 years for men in Norway in 2023. This is a different measure from Eurostat's years without activity limitations and must not be compared as the same series.

Source: FHI, Burden of disease in Norway (GBD 2023)
What do healthy life years and years lived with disability mean?

Healthy life years are based on information about activity limitations and estimated life expectancy. They are not years completely free of illness. Years lived with disability (YLD), by contrast, measures disease burden by weighting different health conditions according to severity. These measures cannot be added together or treated as measuring the same thing.

A comparable time series for healthy life years and a source-verified YLD series will only be added once all annual figures, restrictions and definitions have been confirmed.

Sources: Statistics Norway: Life expectancy 1950–2025 and Bufdir: Healthy life years (Eurostat). Eurostat's latest year in this extract is 2024. Life expectancy, healthy life years and FHI's YLD/HALE have different reference years and definitions.

Eurostat · Norway · hlth_hlye

Trends in healthy life years

Here, healthy life years means the expected number of years without activity limitations due to health problems. This measure is based on EU statistics and must not be confused with FHI's estimates of healthy life expectancy (HALE) or years lived with disability (YLD).

Missing values are shown with a dash (2021). * Eurostat flags 2023 with 'b', indicating a break in the time series. The figures are shown for transparency, but changes across this break must not be interpreted as a directly comparable trend. Source data may subsequently be revised.

Source: Eurostat hlth_hlye, indicator HLY_Y0, unit: years, Norway.

FHI · Global Burden of Disease 2023

Years lived with disability among women and men

Years lived with disability (YLD) is an estimated measure of how disease and injury affect health during life. The figures below cover all ages and causes of disease in Norway. They do not show how many people are ill.

Women

Approx. 305,000

Estimated years lived with disability · 2023

Men

Approx. 257,000

Estimated years lived with disability · 2023

The difference is approximately 48,000 estimated years lived with disability, but these are absolute figures. Population size and age distribution must be considered before comparing risk or disease burden per person.

About the measures and trends over time

YLD is not the same as life expectancy, Eurostat's years without activity limitations or GBD's healthy life expectancy (HALE). Annual figures are rounded in FHI's account. HelseOmsorg21 Monitor reports YLD and DALY at five-year intervals from 1990, with 2023 the latest year in the relevant data display. Years absent from the source must not be constructed. A separate time-series chart requires verified original figures for both sexes and editorial approval.

Source: FHI, Burden of disease in Norway (GBD 2023). Source figures are approximate. The historical points from FHI's GBD estimates are not shown here as a separate chart. HelseOmsorg21 Monitor: disease burden by sex.

WHO · Global Health Estimates 2023 · 2026 edition

Trends in years lived with disability among women and men

The values come from WHO's original tables for Norway, covering all ages and all causes. They show estimated years lived with disability (YLD). These figures are not counts of people with illnesses, nor are they FHI's GBD series.

Women · 2023

428,172 years

Men · 2023

354,294 years

Years with available original values

2000
Women
319,119
Men
255,044
2010
Women
349,542
Men
286,623
2015
Women
371,990
Men
308,805
2019
Women
391,014
Men
321,882
2020
Women
401,710
Men
329,646
2021
Women
408,771
Men
336,835
2022
Women
418,527
Men
346,391
2023
Women
428,172
Men
354,294

Scale: 0–500,000 estimated years lived with disability. The years are unevenly spaced; no values for intervening years have been estimated in this display. Figures are rounded to the nearest whole year lived with disability.

Show table and source details
YearWomenMen
2000319,119255,044
2010349,542286,623
2015371,990308,805
2019391,014321,882
2020401,710329,646
2021408,771336,835
2022418,527346,391
2023428,172354,294

Source: WHO Global Health Estimates 2023, released in 2026. The original files cover 2000, 2010, 2015 and 2019–2023. The values come from the 'All ages' worksheet, the 'All Causes' rows and the NOR column, converted from thousands of years lived with disability into years lived with disability. They are not age-standardised rates and may be affected by changes in population size and age distribution.

WHO Global Health Estimates · Documented original extract on GitHub. GHE and GBD use different methods and produce different estimates; these figures must not be combined.

NAV · Working life and health

Doctor-certified sickness absence by sex

In 2025, doctor-certified sickness absence was 7.2 percent among women and 4.1 percent among men. The corresponding figures in 2024 were 7.5 and 4.3 percent. The percentage represents working days lost relative to contracted working days, not the proportion of people who were ill.

2024

Women7.5 %
Men4.3 %

2025

Women7.2 %
Men4.1 %

Shared scale: 0–8 percent for both years and both sexes.

Show the comparison in a table
YearWomenMen
20247.5%4.3%
20257.2%4.1%

The difference between the sexes alone cannot explain which diagnoses or working conditions underlie it. NAV publishes separate tables by age, diagnosis, industry and occupation. These must be verified separately before we display more detailed charts.

Source: NAV annual statistics

NAV · 2002–2025

Medically certified sickness absence over time

Annual share of scheduled working days lost to medically certified sickness absence, by sex. These are not counts of people.

WomenMenBoth
0%2%4%6%8%2002200620102014201820222025
Show all 24 years as a table
YearWomenMenBoth
20027.9 %5.2 %6.4 %
20038.4 %5.6 %6.8 %
20047.2 %4.6 %5.8 %
20056.6 %4.2 %5.3 %
20067.0 %4.3 %5.5 %
20077.0 %4.2 %5.5 %
20087.2 %4.4 %5.6 %
20097.4 %4.7 %5.9 %
20106.8 %4.2 %5.3 %
20116.8 %4.0 %5.3 %
20126.6 %3.8 %5.1 %
20136.5 %3.8 %5.0 %
20146.5 %3.7 %5.0 %
20156.2 %3.6 %4.8 %
20166.1 %3.5 %4.7 %
20176.4 %3.6 %4.9 %
20186.2 %3.5 %4.8 %
20196.3 %3.6 %4.8 %
20206.7 %3.9 %5.2 %
20216.8 %3.8 %5.2 %
20227.0 %4.1 %5.4 %
20237.2 %4.2 %5.6 %
20247.5 %4.3 %5.8 %
20257.2 %4.1 %5.5 %

Source: NAV Annual Report 2025, Figure 2. This is medically certified absence, not total absence including self-certification. NAV source

NAV · 2025

Sickness absence by age and sex

Medically certified absence as a percentage of scheduled working days in 2025, not the percentage of people who were on sick leave.

WomenMen

16–19 yrs

2.2 %
2.0 %

20–24 yrs

4.7 %
2.9 %

25–29 yrs

7.1 %
3.2 %

30–34 yrs

8.6 %
3.7 %

35–39 yrs

8.0 %
4.0 %

40–44 yrs

7.1 %
4.1 %

45–49 yrs

6.9 %
4.2 %

50–54 yrs

7.1 %
4.4 %

55–59 yrs

7.3 %
5.0 %

60–64 yrs

7.9 %
5.8 %

65–69 yrs

6.5 %
5.1 %

All bars use the same 0–10% scale. Top bar in each age band: women; bottom bar: men.

Show all source values in a table
AgeWomenMen
16–192.2 %2.0 %
20–244.7 %2.9 %
25–297.1 %3.2 %
30–348.6 %3.7 %
35–398.0 %4.0 %
40–447.1 %4.1 %
45–496.9 %4.2 %
50–547.1 %4.4 %
55–597.3 %5.0 %
60–647.9 %5.8 %
65–696.5 %5.1 %

Source: NAV, Annual Report on Medically Certified Sickness Absence 2025, Figure 7. These figures exclude self-certified absence. Original NAV statistics

Gynaecological health

An estimate of how many people have a condition is different from the number who have had the diagnosis recorded. These measures are distinguished here.

Back to the topic overview

Helsenorge and FHI · Gynaecological health

Endometriosis: How many are affected?

Approximately 10%

Helsenorge's estimate for women of reproductive age. The actual prevalence is unknown. This figure is not based on a complete Norwegian count of diagnoses.

Approximately 10 percent is an estimate of how many may have endometriosis. Registry figures, by contrast, show how many people have had the diagnosis recorded in healthcare services. Undiagnosed people are not included in registry figures.

Why do estimates and recorded diagnoses differ?

FHI has also described a range of 6–10 percent for endometriosis. There is no complete Norwegian count of everyone with the condition. A registry study can only show diagnoses recorded in a specific period and service, and therefore must not be interpreted as prevalence in the entire population.

Adenomyosis, PCOS, vulvodynia and heavy menstrual bleeding have their own definitions and data sources. The estimate for endometriosis does not apply to these conditions.

Norwegian Patient Registry · registry study 2008–2021

Recorded endometriosis og adenomyose

A Norwegian registry study included 1,910,661 women aged 15–49. It examined diagnoses recorded in specialist healthcare services between 2008 and 2021.

1.5%

27,773 women

Recorded endometriosis

0.3%

5,432 women

Recorded adenomyosis

0.2%

3,029 women

Recorded with both diagnoses

The group with both diagnoses overlaps the other two categories and must not be added as a separate group. The figures show recorded diagnoses, not how many people actually have the conditions. Undiagnosed people are not captured. The study covers a total of 14 years and is not an annual statistic for 2025.

Source: Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association, 2025

Health Atlas · SKDE · Women aged 16–55

Surgical procedures for endometriosis: two documented years

SKDE reports 1,272 procedures in 2015 and 2,431 procedures in 2024, an increase of 91%. We show these two explicitly published years, not a continuous time series. The figures concern surgical procedures, not the number of women living with endometriosis.

SKDE also finds considerable geographic variation: the hospital catchment area with the highest procedure rate had a rate around four times that of the lowest in 2025. Catchment areas are not the same as counties. We do not show a separate geographic chart without verified rates by catchment area.

Geographical differences in 2019–2021

SKDE reports approximately 2.5 procedures per 1,000 women in Vestfold and 0.6 per 1,000 in Førde and Nord-Trøndelag in 2019–2021. These are hospital catchment areas, not counties, and the figures are not from 2025.

Vestfold2.5
Førde0.6
Nord-Trøndelag0.6

Shared scale: 0–3 per 1,000 women. These regional rates cannot be compared directly with national operation counts. SKDE historical analysis.

See figures and limitations
National procedures, women aged 16–55
YearProcedures
20151,272
20242,431

These are two explicitly published comparison years, not a complete annual series. Procedure counts measure neither the prevalence of endometriosis nor geographically adjusted rates. Variation between catchment areas cannot be inferred from national counts alone.

View the original SKDE analysis

Original source: SKDE / Health Atlas. Presented by Tidlignok, Womanhood Initiative. Figures checked against SKDE's published analysis on 4 November 2026.

From recorded diagnoses to research questions

The Norwegian Patient Registry shows recorded diagnoses, but not how long it took from first symptoms to diagnosis. Norwegian and international studies have examined diagnostic delays. An open question is, among other things, who waits the longest in Norway today.

Explore the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR)

Explore available information about diagnoses recorded in specialist healthcare. The figures describe registered patients and contacts with services, not necessarily how many people in the population have a condition.

Back to the topic overview

FHI · NPR · 2017–2025

Explore 25 diagnosis codes side by side

Choose one diagnosis family and year. Each row counts patients recorded with that exact code in specialist care. A patient may appear in multiple rows; never add the bars together.

The original NPR tables 545/546 do not provide age, sex or county dimensions. Such breakdowns would require an additional aggregated source extract.

N800 · Endometriosis of uterus1,216
N801 · Endometriosis of ovary1,145
N802 · Endometriosis of fallopian tube38
N803 · Endometriosis of pelvic peritoneum2,126
N804 · Endometriosis of rectovaginal septum and vagina163
N805 · Endometriosis of intestine177
N806 · Endometriosis in skin scar74
N808 · Other specified endometriosis530
N809 · Unspecified endometriosis4,184

Shared zero-based scale for codes within the selected year and diagnosis group. Bars cannot be added together.

Full annual table for this diagnosis group
Code201720182019202020212022202320242025
N8005176756626997048241,0029821,216
N8019731,0681,0321,0971,0651,0381,0101,0861,145
N802533129273037302438
N8039861,0301,0611,2061,2691,5041,8111,9522,126
N80410112110795119130140167163
N80574101134123128162184157177
N806603950605455666774
N808331348341332395380411452530
N8092,4412,6362,9862,9173,1313,6663,7463,6824,184

FHI Norwegian Patient Registry, tables 545/546, measure ANT_PAS. Registered specialist-care patients by diagnosis code, not prevalence. Recording can change over time; suppressed data are not zero. Original source

FHI · Norwegian Patient Registry · 2017–2025

Explore recorded diagnoses

Explore registered patients by diagnosis code from 2017 to 2025. Choose one of six diagnosis groups and then a specific code. These are specialist healthcare figures, not counts of people living with the condition in Norway.

N800 · Endometriosis of uterus

Measure: number of registered patients per calendar year. Shared scale across all nine years for the selected diagnosis.

Change from 2024 to 2025

234 more registered patients in 2025 than in 2024 for this diagnosis code.

Changes over time may reflect diagnosis, referrals, changes in healthcare services and recording practices. This is not a direct measure of disease prevalence or individual risk.

See exact annual figures in a table
Annual figures for N800 from 2017 to 2025
YearRegistered patients
2017517
2018675
2019662
2020699
2021704
2022824
20231,002
2024982
20251,216
Source, method and limitations

Original source: FHI, Norwegian Patient Registry, ICD-10 condition codes, table 545. All providers (3), service area 9000, measure ANT_PAS. Figures are annual values from 2017 to 2025 without separate breakdown by sex, age or residence.

FHI describes generally good data quality for somatic specialist healthcare, but coding quality and completeness may vary across variables and periods. Figures for different years must therefore be interpreted cautiously. We have not adjusted for changes in coding, services or patient characteristics.

A patient can have multiple diagnosis codes. Codes therefore cannot be summed to count unique patients. Diagnosis codes describe contact with specialist healthcare, not prevalence in the population.

The historical extract contains 441 source cells in total (431 numerical values and 10 suppressed/missing). All 98 values for 2024–2025 were checked against previous original extracts without discrepancies. Suppressed values are never shown as zero.

Source data last updated: 24 March 2026. Historical original extract and verification: 3 November 2026. Documented source verification covers codes, selections, annual values and overlap, but is not a full audit of historical recording practices.

Open the original FHI table

FHI · Norwegian Patient Registry · 2017–2025

Pregnancy-related diagnoses in the Norwegian Patient Registry

Explore selected diagnosis codes directly related to pregnancy and childbirth, including pre-eclampsia, diabetes in pregnancy and postpartum bleeding. The charts show patients registered with the selected code in specialist healthcare each year. This does not measure how many people in the population have the condition, and codes cannot be summed to count unique patients.

O140 · Mild to moderate pre-eclampsia

2025: 879 registered patients. 90 more than in 2024. Changes may also reflect diagnosis, coding and healthcare use.

The chart includes its original source, unit of measurement, caveats and Womanhood Initiative credit. Missing values are not treated as zero.

Show exact annual figures
Patients registered with O140 per year
YearRegistered patients
2017870
2018823
2019748
2020765
2021797
2022805
2023886
2024789
2025879
About sources and limitations

Original source: FHI NPR, table 546, ICD-10 condition codes. Measure ANT_PAS, service area 9000, all providers (3). Figures for 2017–2025, retrieved and verified on 4 November 2026. This explorer includes seven selected pregnancy- and birth-related diagnosis codes. People may be included under multiple codes and must not be summed as unique patients. The sources do not provide figures broken down by sex or adjusted for population size here. These data concern contact with healthcare services and cannot be used to calculate prevalence or risk.

View original FHI tableOriginal extract and verification on GitHub

Sexual and reproductive health

Contraception use figures tell us about dispensing of registered methods but cannot, on their own, say whether a pregnancy was planned or whether a person is protected against pregnancy.

Back to the topic overview

FHI · Norwegian Prescribed Drug Registry · hormonal contraception

Hormonal contraception use among young women

The Norwegian Institute of Public Health reports that the proportion using hormonal contraception declined among women under 30 up to 2024. Do not compare age groups as if they had the same starting year: FHI uses 2019 as the comparison year for ages 16–19 and 25–29, and 2020 for ages 20–24.

16–19 years

201957 %
202452 %

5 percentage points lower in 2024 than in 2019. The difference is in percentage points, not a percentage change.

20–24 years

202070 %
202460 %

10 percentage points lower in 2024 than in 2020. The difference is in percentage points, not a percentage change.

25–29 years

201955 %
202449 %

6 percentage points lower in 2024 than in 2019. The difference is in percentage points, not a percentage change.

Comparison points specified by the source
AgeEarlier2024
16–19 years57 % (2019)52 %
20–24 years70 % (2020)60 %
25–29 years55 % (2019)49 %

These are registry-based figures for hormonal contraceptives, not a measure of all contraception use or how many people are protected against pregnancy. Condom use and other non-hormonal methods cannot be calculated from these figures. FHI also reports increased use of long-acting methods among young women, but without separately verified annual figures we do not show a line for each method.

Original source: FHI, Medicine use in Norway, Figures 14 and 15

FHI · Norwegian Prescribed Drug Registry · 2023–2025

Prescription dispensing of hormonal contraceptives

Choose age group and medicine group. The figures show women who received medicine from a pharmacy, not how many actually use it for contraception. Some medicines may have other indications.

Number of women with recorded dispensing per 1,000 inhabitants in the age group

202338.06
202437.04
202535.64

The bars are relative to the highest value in the selection. Read the exact rates on the right.

The selected medicine group across all ages, 2025

The same ATC category and year for each age group. Rates are per 1,000 women in the age group, not a measure of contraceptive use.

15 - 19 years25.53
20 - 24 years35.64
25 - 29 years25.44
30 - 34 years26.86
35 - 39 years26.00
40 - 44 years24.88
45 - 49 years24.34
Exact figures across all age groups
AgeWomen with dispensingPer 1,000
15 - 19 years4,22125.53
20 - 24 years5,74035.64
25 - 29 years4,49525.44
30 - 34 years5,12426.86
35 - 39 years5,07326.00
40 - 44 years4,50924.88
45 - 49 years4,23124.34
View corresponding counts and rates in a table
YearWomen with dispensingPer 1,000
20236,09438.06
20245,96237.04
20255,74035.64

The medicine groups do not necessarily correspond to contraceptive methods as people describe them. We cannot sum the figures to count unique contraceptive users, and dispensing does not mean actual use. Condoms and other non-prescription methods are not included.

Original source: FHI Norwegian Prescribed Drug Registry, table 825. Source updated 03/03/2026. Open the source table

Violence and sexual assault centres

Figures from centres show contact with healthcare services. Population surveys also describe the experiences of people who have never sought help.

Back to the topic overview

NKVTS · Population survey

Experiences of violence and sexual assault

Sexual assault centres record contact with healthcare services. Population surveys can also shed light on the experiences of people who never sought help or reported the incident to the police.

14 %

Women who reported rape involving force or coercion

2 %

Men who reported the same

NKVTS interviewed 4,299 people aged 18–74 between June 2021 and June 2022. The study was published in 2023. The figures describe lifetime experiences, not incidents during a single calendar year. Self-reported experiences cannot be directly compared with the number of police reports or visits to sexual assault centres.

Source: NKVTS, 2023 prevalence study

City of Oslo · Sexual Assault Centre

Patients at Oslo Sexual Assault Centre

The Sexual Assault Centre provides emergency healthcare to people aged 14 and over who have experienced, or suspect they have experienced, sexual assault. The figures describe people who received care at the centre, not how many assaults occurred.

Number of registered patients per year

20202021202220232024

Bars start at zero. Figures refer to calendar years and are not adjusted for population size.

Patients in 2024

752

238 more registered patients than in 2020. This alone says nothing about changes in the prevalence of sexual assault.

Show annual figures in a table
YearRegistered patients
2020514
2021582
2022744
2023748
2024752

Medical follow-up after sexual assault

A medical-record study of 744 registered visits to Oslo Sexual Assault Centre in 2022 examined attendance at medical follow-up. A total of 579 accepted follow-up. Of these, 444 (76.7 percent) attended at least one medical check-up during the study period. Among 274 patients whom the centre tried to contact after a missed appointment, 169 attended at least one check-up.

These figures concern registered visits to this centre in 2022, not follow-up attendance at every sexual assault centre in Norway. Researchers did not record unique patients and therefore could not identify any repeat visits by the same person. The study alone cannot determine how many additional patients attended because they were contacted again.

Sources and how to interpret the figures

Patient figures 2020–2024: City of Oslo, Agency for Health, 2024 annual report, page 16. Read the annual report.

Follow-up study: Rogne and colleagues, 'Medical follow-up at Oslo Sexual Assault Centre', Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association, 2026. Read the study.

Limitations: The centre does not measure the prevalence of sexual assault in the population. It accepts patients from Oslo and cooperating municipalities, as well as others seeking emergency care. The number of registered patients is also not the same as the number of police reports, forensic examinations or unique incidents.

2025–2026: Comparable full-year figures for 2025–2026 are unavailable in this overview.

National survey · NORCE / NKLM

Sexual assault centres in Norway

A survey conducted in autumn 2023 examined organisation, staffing, finances, emergency preparedness and follow-up at all 23 sexual assault centres included in the study. This is a survey of services, not a count of all sexual assaults in Norway.

Centres surveyed in 2023

23

NORCE interviewed management at all the centres in the survey.

Later overview

24

The Norwegian Directorate of Health lists 24 sexual assault centres in its more recent status report. The figures refer to different points in time and do not constitute a documented growth series.

Trend in visits · 2013–2023

+72 %

NORCE reports a 72 percent increase in visits to sexual assault centres over ten years. The report also includes a national trend figure for 2008–2023. We do not reproduce individual annual figures from it until the values and definitions of patients, cases and visits have been verified.

Source: NORCE / NKLM, Sexual Assault Centres 2023, report no. 2-2024, section 4.1.6, pages 18–19. This does not measure the prevalence of sexual assault.

Registered cases in 2008 and 2022

2008

1,072

2022

2,450

Comparison of two documented individual years, not a complete time series. Shared scale from 0 to 2,500 cases.

NOU 2024: 4 reports these two national case figures from the National Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care. That corresponds to approximately 129 percent more registered cases. These figures concern contact with sexual assault centres, not the number of sexual assaults in the population.

Source: NOU 2024: 4, Chapter 15, Figure 15.1. This is not the same comparison period as NORCE's 72 percent for 2013–2023. The figures come from different periods and use different definitions. They therefore cannot be combined into a reliable year-by-year comparison.

What did the survey find?

  • 11 of 23 centres were located at out-of-hours emergency primary-care services, with different agreements with hospital trusts.
  • All surveyed centres reported offering examinations to people of all sexes.
  • Most had a lower age limit of 14 years for examining children. Services offered to younger children must therefore be examined separately.
  • Financial resources and access to qualified staff varied between centres.
  • At many centres, emergency staffing was organised through call-out lists, creating a risk that the necessary staff might not be available quickly enough.
  • Provision of medical and psychosocial follow-up varied considerably.

The findings show differences in how services are organised. They do not show how many people were turned away, how long patients waited or whether a particular person received adequate care.

Sources and limitations

NORCE / NKLM: Survey of sexual assault centres (2023). The study was conducted in autumn 2023 and published in 2024. The main findings are based on interviews and reports from the centres.

Norwegian Directorate of Health: Survey of clinical forensic services for adults. The source lists 24 centres in a later status report.

NORCE also collects annual case figures and publishes a trend chart for 2008–2023. The report states that visits increased by 72 percent between 2013 and 2023. Without the exact annual figures, we cannot say how the increase was distributed across the individual years.

Health differences

How do self-rated health, recorded health problems and healthcare use vary between groups? Association does not necessarily imply causation.

Back to the topic overview

FHI and Statistics Norway · 2025

Eating disorders and self-rated health

Eating disorders recorded in specialist healthcare

FHI reports that the proportion of teenage girls and young women with eating disorders recorded in specialist healthcare increased over time, but that the trend has stabilised in recent years. These are people who have had a diagnosis recorded, not everyone with an eating disorder.

How was this studied, and what do the figures not show?

FHI publishes annual series for 2010–2025 by age and sex for diagnoses with ICD-10 code F50. Among boys, the recorded proportions were below 0.1 percent in all age groups. The exact age-disaggregated annual series appears in FHI's Figures 13 and 14, but is not reproduced here as a separate numerical chart.

A Norwegian study from 2023 found a prevalence of 9 percent among 16–19-year-olds. The result may be affected by the pandemic and by who responded. A population survey and registry figures measure different things and should therefore not be compared directly.

Source: FHI, Figures 13 and 14 (2010–2025)

How do women and men rate their own health?

In Statistics Norway's 2025 health survey, 74 percent of women and 78 percent of men rated their health as good or very good. This means that a smaller proportion of women reported good health in this survey.

Women74 %
Men78 %

Shared bar scale: 0–100 percent. Self-reported health, not a diagnosis. Between 2015 and 2025, the proportion fell by four percentage points among women and three among men.

Source: Statistics Norway, Health conditions – Survey of Living Conditions 2025

FHI · National Public Health Survey 2025

Health and educational attainment

The proportion rating their own health as good or very good, by education and sex. The figures are age-adjusted and cover people over 25 who are not students.

Shared scale from 0 to 100 percent. Age-adjusted percentages, not numbers of people.

EducationWomenMen
Compulsory education54.0 %60.3 %
Upper secondary education62.6 %65.2 %
Vocational tertiary education/higher education under two years69.8 %71.8 %
Higher education, 2–4 years76.5 %76.5 %
Higher education, more than four years82.9 %84.4 %

Among women, the difference between the lowest and highest education categories is 28.9 percentage points. FHI found no clear differences between sexes within individual education groups. The figures show an association between education and health but cannot establish the cause. Sampling, weighting and self-reporting affect interpretation.

Source: FHI, National Public Health Survey 2025, Figure 2

Sources and further statistics

Here you will find original sources and topics that do not yet have a comparable data series. This is documentation, not additional findings.

Back to the topic overview

Topics without fully comparable statistics

For some areas of health, surveys and registry information exist, but not yet figures that can be compared consistently from year to year. This does not mean we lack knowledge about the conditions.

See the topics and available figures

Gynaecological conditions without comparable national annual series

PCOS, vulvodynia, heavy menstrual bleeding and menopausal symptoms.

Registry data count people who have received a diagnosis, while population surveys may also capture those who have not received a diagnosis. The figures therefore concern different groups.

Source and further statistics

Mental health and eating disorders by age

Annual figures for girls and women broken down by age and diagnosis.

FHI shows changes over time and across age groups. Without exact annual figures, we cannot show the size of these changes in a separate detailed chart.

Source and further statistics

Social differences beyond education

Income, geography and healthcare use.

Differences by education are shown above. Income and residence may also matter for health and healthcare use, but must be compared within the same population group using the same unit of measurement.

Source and further statistics

Sources and further reading

Explore original statistics

Here you will find links to statistics from FHI, the Norwegian Directorate of Health, Statistics Norway and Health Atlas. This is an overview of external data sources, not charts produced by Tidlignok. We describe what the sources contain and the limitations you should know about. Figures from different sources cannot always be compared directly.

Show data sources and explanations

FHI · Norwegian Patient Registry

Waiting times and patient rights

Official waiting-list figures with waiting times, referrals and deadlines. Monthly figures are preliminary, whereas four-month and annual figures are official statistics.

What should we be aware of?

Not the same as waiting times with contracted specialists. Distinguish between those still waiting and those who have begun receiving healthcare.

Open the original statistics

Norwegian Directorate of Health

Waiting time before healthcare begins

Mean and median waiting time in somatic healthcare services.

What should we be aware of?

The indicator is being revised. Changes in recording practices from June 2024 must be examined when comparing figures.

Open the original statistics

Norwegian Directorate of Health · SAMDATA

Inpatient treatment and outpatient contacts

Use of specialist healthcare by area of residence, sex and age where the data allow.

What should we be aware of?

Patients and contacts are different measures. An area of residence does not necessarily correspond to a county.

Open the original statistics

SKDE · Health Atlas

Geographical differences in treatment

Gynaecological analyses of geographic variation in healthcare use, including operations for endometriosis.

What should we be aware of?

High rates of treatment do not automatically mean better quality or access.

Open the original statistics

SSB

Capacity and activity in specialist healthcare

Published statistics on capacity, activity and resources in specialist healthcare.

What should we be aware of?

Geographical breakdowns vary between series; breakdown by sex is not always possible.

Open the original statistics

How have we used the four sources?

  • Health Atlas / SKDE: New chart with two verified comparison years for endometriosis surgery under Gynaecological health. Exact geographic rates are currently available only from SKDE.
  • Norwegian Directorate of Health: We already show general waiting-time statistics under Waiting times and treatment. The Directorate's general indicator is under revision and does not provide a verified sex-specific series that would add new information here. We retain a link to the original source.
  • Statistics Norway: New chart with women and men in all published age groups for out-of-hours emergency consultations per person in 2025 under Healthcare use. Other Statistics Norway charts are already available in the same section.
  • FHI / Norwegian Patient Registry: Waiting times in 2023–2025 and recorded diagnoses are already shown under Waiting times and NPR. The overall waiting-time figures are not sex-specific, so we do not create a duplicate suggesting that they describe female patients separately.

Reviewed on 4 November 2026. We do not publish new figures without confirmed definitions, population, reference period and source.

When comparing sources, it is important to check who the figures describe, the period measured, and whether the data count patients, treatments or waiting times.